Microstelium hyalinum Pat. and Acrospermum puiggarii Speg., established as non-lichenized fungi in 1899 and 1919, respectively, are conspecific with Gomphillus ophiosporus Kalb & Vězda, a muscicolous lichen described in 1988, widespread and common throughout the Neotropics. This is another example where crustose lichens with reduced thallus morphology have been mistaken for non-lichenized fungi hidden in often obscure and barely known fungal genera, with epithets that have priority over well-established lichen names. The options of conservation or rejection of names are inappropriate to solve this problem, since names currently in use can only be conserved against those rejected at the same time, and each discovery of an earlier epithet requires a conservation and rejection proposal [ICBN Art. 14.4]. Alternative solutions would be conserving names over unlisted synonyms, as currently possible for spermatophyte and bryophyte families [ICBN Art. 14.5], or automatically conserving names in current use under specific conditions as practiced in zoological nomenclature [ICZN Art. 23.9]. Since these options are currently unavailable for species names in botanical nomenclature, and a conservation proposal according to ICBN Art. 14.4 would have little chance of success, the new combination Gomphillus hyalinus (Pat.) Lücking, Kalb & Vězda is introduced.
How to translate text using browser tools
1 September 2007
The fungi Microstelium hyalinum and Acrospermum puiggarii are the same as the lichen Gomphillus ophiosporus (Ostropales: Gomphillaceae)
Robert Lücking
ACCESS THE FULL ARTICLE
The Bryologist
Vol. 110 • No. 3
Fall 2007
Vol. 110 • No. 3
Fall 2007
Acrospermum
conservation and rejection of names
Gomphillus
International Code of Botanical Nomenclature (ICBN)
International Code of Zoological Nomenclature (ICZN)
Microstelium